From Bubble app to production code: why Alex made the switch

Alex Rodriguez thought he'd found the perfect solution. Build his SaaS on Bubble, skip all the coding complexity, and focus on customers instead of debugging. For eight months, it worked great. Then reality hit.

The honeymoon phase

"Honestly, Bubble was amazing at first," Alex told me over coffee last month. "I went from idea to working prototype in two weeks. No backend setup, no database design, no deployment headaches. Just drag, drop, and ship."

His app helped small businesses track customer feedback across multiple channels. Simple concept, but building it from scratch would've taken months. On Bubble, he had paying customers within six weeks.

When the cracks started showing

The problems started small. Page load times getting slower. Workflows that used to take seconds now taking minutes. "At first I thought it was just me," Alex said. "But then customers started complaining."

The breaking point came during a demo with a potential enterprise client. The app just... froze. For three minutes. In front of their entire team. "I wanted to disappear," Alex laughed. "Here I am talking about efficiency and reliability, and my app won't even load."

The real cost of no-code

Alex crunched the numbers. Between Bubble's subscription fees, third-party integrations, and the time he spent working around platform limitations, he was paying more than he'd spend on hosting and development combined.

"The worst part was feeling trapped," he said. "Every feature request meant either paying for another plugin or figuring out some creative workaround. I wasn't building a product anymore—I was playing Jenga with someone else's blocks."

Making the leap

The transition took four months. Alex hired a developer friend part-time and rebuilt the core functionality in Rails. "I was terrified we'd lose momentum," he admitted. "But keeping the old app running while building the new one meant customers barely noticed."

They didn't try to replicate every Bubble feature. Instead, they focused on the 20% that customers actually used. The result? A faster, more reliable app that cost 60% less to run.

What he learned about timing

"I should've made the switch earlier," Alex said. "I kept thinking I needed to be bigger to justify custom development. But actually, being small made it easier—fewer features to migrate, fewer customers to worry about."

The sweet spot, he thinks, is around $5K monthly revenue. Enough to justify the investment, but not so much that you can't afford downtime during the transition.

When no-code still makes sense

Alex isn't anti-no-code entirely. "For validating ideas? Bubble's perfect. Build fast, test with real users, figure out what works. But once you know people want your product, you need to own your technology."

He recommends no-code for prototypes, simple internal tools, and businesses where software isn't the main value proposition. "If you're running a consulting company and need a basic client portal, stay on Bubble. But if software is your business, you need to control it."

The unexpected benefits

Beyond performance improvements, Alex discovered advantages he hadn't anticipated. Custom features that would've been impossible on Bubble. Direct integrations with client systems. The ability to optimize for his specific use case instead of working within platform constraints.

"Most importantly," he said, "I can actually fix things when they break instead of filing support tickets and hoping for the best."

The migration strategy that worked

Alex's approach was methodical. First, he rebuilt the user authentication and core data models. Then the main workflows, one at a time. The old Bubble app kept running while he gradually moved features to the new platform.

"We used webhooks to sync data between the old and new systems," he explained. "Users could log into either version and see the same information. Once a feature was stable in the new app, we'd redirect that part of the traffic."

The whole migration took four months, but customers only experienced one planned downtime—a four-hour maintenance window to switch over the last few components.

What he'd do differently

"I would've planned the data export better," Alex said. "Bubble doesn't make it easy to get your data out in a clean format. We spent weeks cleaning up inconsistent field types and missing relationships."

He also wished he'd started building the development team earlier. "I tried to do too much myself at first. Having experienced help from day one would've cut the timeline in half."

The numbers

Six months after the switch, Alex's metrics tell the story:

• Page load times dropped from 8 seconds to under 2
• Monthly hosting costs went from $400 to $150
• Customer support tickets about performance dropped 80%
• New feature development time cut in half

Revenue grew 40% in the same period, partly because enterprise clients felt more confident about the platform's reliability.

Advice for other founders

"Don't let anyone shame you for starting with no-code," Alex said. "It got me to market faster and helped me understand what customers actually wanted. But have an exit strategy from day one."

His recommendation: set a specific milestone—revenue, user count, or feature complexity—where you'll reevaluate the platform. Don't wait until you're forced to switch by performance problems or customer complaints.

"The transition is never convenient," he added. "But it's easier when you choose the timing instead of having it chosen for you."

‍