Building MVPs: a success story

So here's the thing about MVPs—everyone gets them wrong. Most founders think MVP means "crappy first version." Wrong. It means "smallest thing that teaches you something valuable." Let me tell you about how we learned this the hard way.

The problem we thought we were solving

Our team was convinced that project managers needed better Gantt charts. We'd spent weeks talking to PMs, and they all complained about existing tools being either too simple or impossibly complex. Seemed obvious, right?

We spent two months building this beautiful, intuitive Gantt chart tool. Clean interface, smart scheduling, collaborative features—the works. When we finally showed it to people, they said "this is nice" and then... never used it.

What we were actually solving

Turns out, the real problem wasn't that Gantt charts sucked. It's that most teams don't actually work in a way where Gantt charts are useful. They need to track work that's constantly changing, not plan detailed schedules weeks in advance.

The PMs we talked to complained about Gantt charts because that's what they thought project management software was supposed to do. But when we watched them work, they mostly just needed to answer "what's everyone working on right now?"

The real MVP approach

We scrapped the Gantt charts and built a dead-simple status board. Three columns: "Working on," "Stuck on," and "Done this week." Team members could update their status with a single click.

Took us three days to build. People started using it immediately.

Why this worked

The status board solved the actual problem—visibility into what was happening right now. It didn't try to do project planning or resource allocation or any of the fancy stuff we thought people wanted.

More importantly, it fit into how teams already worked instead of forcing them to change their process.

What we learned about MVPs

Start with observation, not interviews. People tell you what they think they should want, not what they actually need. Watch them work for an hour and you'll learn more than from ten interviews.

Pick one specific moment of frustration. Don't try to fix an entire workflow. Find the exact moment when someone goes "ugh, this is annoying" and solve just that.

Make it stupid simple. If your MVP has a user manual, it's too complex. People should be able to figure it out in 30 seconds.

The validation we got

Within a week, teams were using our status board daily. They started asking for tiny tweaks—can we add tags? Can we see last week's progress? These were signals we were on the right track.

More importantly, they were solving real problems with workarounds when our tool didn't quite fit. That told us where to focus next.

Growing from the MVP

Instead of building a grand roadmap, we just fixed the most obvious next problem our users had. Then the next one. Each iteration took days, not months.

Six months later, we had a proper project management tool, but it looked nothing like what we originally planned. It was better because it grew from real usage instead of theoretical requirements.

The counterintuitive part

The hardest thing about building a real MVP is throwing away good ideas. We had this list of features that would clearly make the product better—time tracking, file sharing, reporting dashboards.

But we didn't build any of them until users specifically asked. Most of them never got asked for. Turns out our "clearly better" ideas were just feature bloat.

What this means for your MVP

Don't build the product you think people need. Build the smallest thing that tests your riskiest assumption. For us, the assumption was "people want better project planning tools." We were wrong—they wanted better visibility tools.

Start with one workflow, one user type, one specific problem. Everything else is a distraction until you nail that first thing.

‍